Which of the following symbiotic relationships is considered parasitic?

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Which of the following symbiotic relationships is considered parasitic?”.

3 Responses to Which of the following symbiotic relationships is considered parasitic?

  1. I would have to say B, because ticks would not be symbiotic and pilot fish and insects on a hippo are not parasitic.

    The bees and flowers could be both useful and harmful depending on the circumstances.

    wikipedia.com

    Report Spam/Abuse

  2. melvinschmugmeier

    A, ticks feeding on a dog.

    I would NOT say B because the flowers designed themselves so that the bees would take the pollen.

    wikipedia.com

    Report Spam/Abuse

  3. For me, there is a contradiction in the question. If a relationship is parasitic it can’t be also symbiotic. Symbiotic means both individuals get benefits, parasitic, only one gets benefits. Thus, the only parasitic relationship I see is a)

    Common Sense :D

    Report Spam/Abuse

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>